Read: 386
Original Text:
Hello there!
I'm currently doing some research in the field of Data Science and trying to understand how we can predict a continuous variable by using , like Linear Regression.
For this particular case study, I chose a dataset from the UCI Repository that contns information about automobile prices. The goal is to use various car characteristics such as size, number of cylinders, fuel type, etc., to forecast the price of an automobile.
In my analysis, I've applied several including Linear Regression, Decision Trees, and Random Forests. Theseare widely used in regression tasks because they can handle continuous output values.
After trning theseon the dataset, we observed that all of them were able to predict car prices with a certn level of accuracy. The most promising results came from the Random Forest model which showed lower prediction errors compared to both Linear Regression and Decision Trees.
The study provides some valuable insights into how different algorithms can be utilized for predicting car prices based on various features. It also demonstrates that more complexlike Random Forests t to perform better than simpler ones like linear regression, when it comes to handling non-linear relationships in the data.
To improve my understanding even further, I plan on experimenting with other datasets and exploring advanced techniques such as feature engineering or hyperparameter tuning for these.
Improvised Text:
Greeting!
I am currently engaged in a research project centered around Data Science, specifically focusing on how algorithms can predict continuous variables through the application of Linear Regression.
In this particular study, I have chosen a dataset from the reputable UCI Repository that provides insights into automobile pricing data. The objective is to leverage various car characteristics like size, cylinder count, fuel type, and others for forecasting the price of an automobile.
Utilizing a range of including Linear Regression, Decision Trees, and Random Forests in my analysis has revealed their capability to handle regression tasks proficiently given their ability to process continuous output values.
Upon trning theseon the dataset, I observed that all showed some level of accuracy in predicting car prices. However, when examining the prediction errors, it became clear that the Random Forest model had significantly lower errors than both Linear Regression and Decision Trees, thereby demonstrating its superiority.
This study contributes to our understanding of how diverse algorithms can be used for predicting automobile pricing based on different features. It also highlights that more complexlike Random Forests t to surpass simpler ones like linear regression when it comes to dealing with non-linear relationships within the dataset.
To deepen my knowledge further, I int to experiment with various datasets and explore advanced techniques such as feature engineering or hyperparameter tuning for theseto achieve even better predictive outcomes.
This article is reproduced from: https://fastercapital.com/topics/empowering-investors-through-knowledge-and-action.html/2
Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.i466.com/Financial_and_financial_stocks/Data_Sci_Regression_Auto_prices_Analysis_Random_Forest.html
Predicting Car Prices with Machine Learning Models Linear Regression vs Decision Trees vs Random Forests UCI Machine Learning Repository Analysis on Autos Complex Models Outperform Simple Ones in Auto Pricing Automating Price Forecasting with Data Science Tools Non Linear Relationships in Automobile Pricing Study